What is AEO? A plain guide to answer engine optimisation
How assistants decide what to cite, which advice doesn’t hold up, and what we’ve seen in our own scans.
What does AEO mean?
AEO stands for answer engine optimisation. An answer engine gives people a written answer instead of a list of links. ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Copilot and Google’s AI Overviews all work this way.
Ask one of them “What’s the best help desk software for a small SaaS team?” and the answer usually names a few products and stops. AEO is the work of being one of those names, and of being described correctly when you are.
You’ll also see GEO (generative engine optimisation) and AI SEO. People draw small distinctions between these terms, but there’s no settled line between them. This guide uses AEO for all of it.
How is AEO different from SEO?
SEO aims to get your pages ranked in a list of results. AEO aims to get your brand named, correctly, inside the answer.
| Compare | SEO | AEO |
|---|---|---|
| The goal | Rank in a list of links | Be named and described correctly |
| What people see | Pages to choose from | A short answer naming a few businesses |
| What you measure | Rankings and clicks | How often you’re named, how you’re described and which sources are cited |
| Where the work happens | Your pages, and the sites that link to them | Your pages, and what other sites say about you |
AEO builds on SEO and doesn’t replace it. Google says a page must be indexed and eligible to show with a snippet to appear as a link in AI Overviews or AI Mode, and that there are no additional technical requirements.
How do AI assistants decide what to cite?
An AI assistant passes three gates before it cites your page. It decides whether to search at all, since some answers come from what its model learned in training. It turns the question into its own searches, and your page has to come back in the results. Then it picks what to cite from those results.
Three gates before a citation
- 1Search at all
Some answers come from what the model learned in training.
- 2Come back in the results
The assistant turns the question into its own searches, and your page has to be returned.
- 3Get picked
It chooses what to cite from those results.
Getting into the results seems to matter most. A University of Toronto preprint from October 2026 found that every page ChatGPT cited, across 22,315 URLs, was among those its own search had returned. Comparing pages on the same website, retrieval explained 32% of the variation in citations and page properties explained 2.8%. This is one correlational study, not yet peer reviewed, of API models in narrow markets, so treat it as the best evidence so far and not as settled.
What explained citations on the same website
Two page properties did hold up in that study: a title that closely matches the question, and one paragraph that closely matches it. For a writer, that points to something plain. Give each specific question a page or section that answers it directly, in words people would use to ask it.
Searches can also go beyond the question typed. Google says its AI features may run “multiple related searches across subtopics and data sources”, so a page can be used because it answers a narrower question behind the original one.
Crawler access matters too. OpenAI says sites that block OAI-SearchBot won’t be shown in ChatGPT’s search answers, while GPTBot is a separate crawler for training. You can block one and allow the other.
Why isn’t being cited the same as being named?
A citation links to your page. A mention puts your brand’s name in the answer. They often don’t come together. In a Semrush study of 3,981 appearances across 115 prompts, 61.7% cited a domain without naming the brand, 25.1% named it without citing it and 13.2% did both. Semrush sells a tool that measures this, and the sample is modest.
How 3,981 brand appearances split
- 61.7% cited the domain without naming the brand
- 25.1% named the brand without citing it
- 13.2% did both
The same answer can give you any of these
Made-up example: Helpwren is the brand
Help desks with shared inboxes tend to suit small teams, and setup usually takes a few days.
- helpwren.example
For a small SaaS team, consider Helpwren or Ticketfern.
- reviewsite.example
Helpwren suits small teams that want to be set up within a day.
- helpwren.example
So a definition page, including this one, can earn citations without anyone hearing a brand’s name. Being named seems to depend more on other sites. In the Toronto study’s small B2B dataset of 55 queries, when a cited third-party page named a vendor, the odds that ChatGPT’s answer named that vendor were 39.7 times higher. In its larger consumer dataset, they were 4.2 times higher. An Ahrefs study of about 75,000 brands, published in May 2025, found branded web mentions correlated 0.664 with mentions in AI Overviews, and backlinks 0.218. Ahrefs sells SEO tools. Both findings are correlations, and larger brands naturally get more of everything.
The practical point is to look beyond your own site, and to earn mentions honestly. Google says that seeking inauthentic mentions “isn’t as helpful as it might seem”.
What have we seen in our own scans?
Measuring AI answers is easy to get wrong, and we’ve got it wrong ourselves. These are from our own early scans in October 2026.
- Our extraction invented mentions. When ChatGPT asked a clarifying question and named nobody, our software sometimes still recorded businesses from its own instructions. One pilot’s report put a brand at 9% visibility and first position after two answers that named nobody were recorded as naming it. Across our database at the time, 114 of 705 recorded mentions named a business the answer didn’t contain. We now keep a name only if it appears in the answer’s text. If you’re using any tool, including ours, spot-check its results against the answers themselves.
- Location can change the answer. A developer tool’s scans ran as if from Dubai, and its answers filled up with UAE providers, which said little about its global market. We now ask without a location unless a business has a specific market.
- One product can have many names. A single API product appeared under four spellings in one pilot. Unless those are merged, its share gets split and looks smaller than it is.
- Small wording changes can decide whether an answer appears. When we tested Google, “What is the best aesthetic clinic in Dubai Marina?” returned an AI Overview, and “Best aesthetic clinic in Dubai Marina?” didn’t.
How we know this: these come from small pilot scans and one test search, so they show what can go wrong and not how often. Quotable sells a tool that measures AI answers.
Which AEO advice doesn’t hold up?
Much popular AEO advice has weak evidence behind it, or has failed when re-tested. No one has published a randomised test on live pages in live engines, so none of this is final.
| Common advice | What the evidence says |
|---|---|
| Add statistics and quotations | A 2024 lab paper reported gains of up to 40%. A 2025 re-test on simulated search found significant improvements in 3 of 54 cases, and statistics lowered rankings in 19 of 24 settings. Neither tested a live engine |
| Add schema so AI cites you | Ahrefs compared 1,885 pages that added schema with matched pages and found no clear lift. Google says it isn’t required for its AI features |
| Publish an llms.txt file | Google says its Search ignores these files. Other assistants may treat them differently |
| Write to a word count | Ahrefs found a correlation of 0.04 between length and citation across 174,048 cited pages. It looked only at cited pages, so this isn’t a full test |
| Break pages into small chunks | Google says there’s no requirement to break content into tiny pieces |
| Track your position in the answer | SparkToro found under a 1 in 100 chance of the same list appearing twice, and order repeats far less often. This wasn’t peer reviewed, and one co-author works at a tracking company |
Clear headings, tables and facts are still worth having, because people scan and need the answer. Just don’t expect formatting alone to earn citations.
Where should you start?
Start by finding out where you stand, before changing anything. You can do this without paying for a tool:
- Run the AI readiness checker and the AI crawler checker to catch access problems.
- Use the AI question generator to list questions customers might ask in your category, then correct them from what you hear in sales calls.
- Ask each question several times in ChatGPT, Gemini and Google. Note who’s named, how you’re described, what’s wrong and which sites are cited.
- Fix the clearest gap. That might be a blocked crawler, a question with no page on your site, or a review site where rivals appear and you don’t.
- Ask the same questions again, and compare.
Doing this by hand gets slow once you have many questions. Quotable, which we make, runs your questions on each engine on a schedule and tracks the results. Other tools do this too, so compare them on how they count and whether you can read the answers behind each number.
How should you report AEO to your team?
Report AEO as shares across many runs, not as ranks or single answers. Answers vary from run to run, so a single check tells you little: an Ahrefs study published in October 2026 found 50% to 83% of cited sites had gone by the next day, depending on the assistant (about 50% to 60% once answers citing nothing are left out), though about 75% of those that dropped out came back within 20 days.
A report someone can defend has four features:
Four features of a report someone can defend
- Counts with their base
Such as “named in 23 of 200 answers”, for each engine separately.
- Separate numbers
For being named, being cited and being described correctly.
- Control questions
Questions you aren’t working on, so you can tell your work from the assistants changing.
- A plain limit
We don’t know of strong evidence linking tracked mentions to revenue, so present them as an early signal alongside branded search and sign-ups.
What can’t AEO do?
Nobody can guarantee that an assistant will name you, and that includes us. You don’t control the answer. You can improve what assistants are able to find and read, earn mentions elsewhere, and measure what happens.
AEO also won’t fix a weak position. If people rarely talk about your product, or a rival really does suit the question better, no page will change that for long.
Questions
Does AEO replace SEO?
No. Google’s AI features use pages that are already indexed and eligible for Search, so SEO remains the base. AEO adds attention to how you’re named and described in answers, and to what other sites say about you.
Is AEO the same as GEO?
Mostly, yes. AEO stands for answer engine optimisation and GEO for generative engine optimisation. Some people draw small distinctions, but there’s no settled line between them, and both describe the work of being named in AI answers.
How long does AEO take to work?
There’s no reliable figure, and we know of no study that measures it for new sites. Some changes register quickly: OpenAI says robots.txt changes can take about 24 hours to affect its search. New pages and mentions on other sites take longer, so measure over several weeks.
Related tools
- AI readiness checkerFive quick checks that AI assistants can read your site.
- AI question generatorTurn your category into questions to ask AI assistants.
- AI crawler checkerSee which AI bots your robots.txt allows or blocks.
See what AI says about you, every week
Quotable asks ChatGPT, Gemini and Google AI Overviews for you, then shows what they say about your brand and what to fix.
Related articles
Drafted with AI assistance and checked against the linked sources.
Sources
- Chen and Koudas, What Drives AI Citations? (preprint, October 2026)
- Puerto et al., C-SEO Bench: Does Conversational SEO Work? (October 2025)
- Aggarwal et al., GEO: Generative Engine Optimization (KDD 2024)
- Google Search Central, AI features and your website
- Google Search Central, generative AI optimisation guide
- OpenAI, overview of OpenAI crawlers
- Semrush, the ghost citations study (June 2026)
- Ahrefs, how stable AI citations are (October 2026)
- Ahrefs, schema and AI citations (May 2026)
- Ahrefs, short and long content in AI Overviews (December 2025)
- Ahrefs, AI Overview brand correlation (May 2025)
- SparkToro, AIs are highly inconsistent when recommending brands (January 2026)